# Data representation (part 2)

**28 minutes**of video content.

### Data representation in the computer

### Integer representation

### Integer representation : sign magnitude

### Integer representation : two's complement

#### Activity: Integer overflow calculator

Graded Playground Autograder

**Activity Prompt:**

In this problem, you will implement the function `ExponentToOverflow`

with parameters `int starting_value`

value and an `unsigned int base`

. The function
will multiply `starting_value`

by increasing powers of `base`

(`base^1, base^2, ..., base^(n-1), base^n`

)
until integer overflow is observed. You can use `pow`

from `<cmath>`

. Should you do so, keep in mind `pow`

returns a double; your program must perform integer arithmetic when multiplying the base raised to the exponent against the `starting_value`

.

`ExponentToOverflow`

will return
an `std::pair<unsigned int, int>`

(you can use `std::make_pair`

), where the pair's first field is the `exp`

onent that `base`

was raised to that caused overflow when multiplied by `int starting_value`

. The pair's second field is the number that was observed when overflow occurred.

For example, if we invoked:

`ExponentToOverflow(1048, 2);`

- The implementation of
`ExponentToOverflow`

would multiply the original value`1048`

by base`2`

raised to increasing exponent values until overflow was observed. - On my machine, this occurred with exponent
`21`

and the overflow value observed was`-2097152000`

. - That is, when we multiplied
`1048 * 2^21`

, integer overflow was observed for the first time: exponents`1`

through`20`

inclusive did not cause overflow.

- The implementation of
`ExponentToOverflow(-2000, 2);`

- The implementation of
`ExponentToOverflow`

would multiply the original value`-2000`

by base`2`

raised to increasing exponent values until overflow was observed. - On my machine, this occurred with exponent
`21`

and the overflow value observed was`100663296`

. - That is, when we multiplied
`-2000 * 2^21`

, integer overflow was observed for the first time: exponents`1`

through`20`

inclusive did not cause overflow.

- The implementation of
`ExponentToOverflow(-20000, 4);`

- The implementation of
`ExponentToOverflow`

would multiply the original value`-20000`

by base`4`

raised to increasing exponent values until overflow was observed. - On my machine, this occurred with exponent
`9`

and the overflow value observed was`-947912704`

. - For this case, why is the computed overflow value negative when the starting value passed to this function is
`-20000`

? Consider that on my machine:`-20000 * 4^8 = -1310720000`

and`-20000 * 4^9 = -947912704`

. Did you notice that`-20000 * 4^9`

evaluates to a less negative value than`-20000 * 4^8`

? Consider that`std::numeric_limits<int>::min()`

returns`-2,147,483,648`

and that`-20000 * 4^9`

should equal`5,242,880,000`

. Do you see what's going on? Make sure you consider such cases for positive and negative`starting_value`

s! You can do this by comparing the value you computed with exponent`n`

to the value computed with exponent`n-1`

.

- The implementation of